Read today’s open letter from Pedro Quiroz, Jr., Theresa Quiroz, and Richard Lawrence here: OpenLetter_2011-06-14_WordPress.
Representative court and settlement documents are linked below.
Judgment in SanDOG’s first lawsuit against City of San Diego over Tijuana River Valley is here: 1593.00_Notice_of_Entry_Judgment.
Preliminary injunction ruling in SanDOG’s second lawsuit against City of San Diego over Tijuana River Valley is here: 1593.03_PI_Ruling.
Judgment in SanDOG’s third lawsuit against City of San Diego over Tijuana River Valley is here: 1593.06_Judgment.
Judgment in CREED-21’s lawsuit against City of San Diego over illegal environmental-review exemptions is here: 1593.04_Judgment.
Settlement agreement in SanDOG’s lawsuit over Southwestern Community College District bribery allegations is here (one of multiple identical agreements signed by various parties): 1593.10_Settlement_Part.
SanDOG’s opening and reply briefs in Court of Appeal to challenge City of San Diego’s convention center tax are here: Opening_FINAL_ALL and Reply_FINAL_ALL.
Latest allegations in SanDOG’s lawsuit over City of San Diego’s tourism marketing district tax is here: 1593.13_Latest_Allegations.
Latest allegations in SanDOG’s lawsuit over City of San Diego’s illegal infrastructure bonds to pay for the Jacobs parking structure in Balboa Park is here: 1593.15_Balboa_Park_Lawsuit.
Final ruling in SanDOG’s lawsuit against City of San Diego over Westfield’s UTC sign program is here: 1593.18_UTC_Ruling.
Latest allegations in SanDOG’s lawsuit over Jan Goldsmith’s personal e-mails concerning City of San Diego business is here: 1593.28_Goldsmith_Lawsuit.
Latest allegations in SanDOG’s lawsuit over Todd Gloria’s personal e-mails and text messages concerning City of San Diego business is here: 1007.40_Complaint.
Latest allegations in SanDOG’s lawsuit over City of San Diego’s illegal infrastructure borrowing is here: 1593.30_Infrastructure.
Admissions by City of San Diego that it withheld public records necessary for environmental appeal hearing and that it must reimburse CREED-21’s attorney fees and costs are here: 1007.32_Stip and 1007.36_Stip.
Final ruling in CREED-21’s lawsuit against SANDAG for inadequate environmental review for 2050 Regional Transportation Plan is here (case was consolidated with Cleveland National Forest Foundation’s parallel case): 1007.31_Final_Ruling.
Walmart’s December 2013 letter informing City of Barstow about 250-kw solar system to be installed after “[w]orking with CREED-21” is here: 1366.69_Solar_Letter.
Walmart’s February 2010 letter informing City of Riverside about 250-kw solar system to be installed on new supercenter is here (Richard Lawrence and Cory Briggs worked on this case, helping a local community group): 1366.03_Solar_Letter.
Statement of decision and court-approved settlement terms terminating court’s jurisdiction over 2007 lawsuit against City of Murrietta’s approval of Target shopping center are here (Richard Lawrence and Cory Briggs also worked on this case, helping another local community group): 1366.07_Stip_for_Adoption_Statement_of_Decision and 1366.07_Final_Stip_Dimissing_Case_Dissolving_Writ.
Target developer’s letter acknowledging 350-kw solar system to be installed on new store as part of settling CREED-21’s 2012 lawsuit over new Victorville store is here: 1366.60_Solar_Letter.
sandiegans4opengov 